Home
Resource
The psychology of time and its philosophical implications
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(1.13 MB)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Montemayor, Carlos. The psychology of time and its philosophical implications. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T30R9PJJ

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleThe psychology of time and its philosophical implications
NameMontemayor, Carlos (author); Goldman, Alvin (chair); Egan, Frances (internal member); Zimmerman, Dean (internal member); Gallistel, Charles (outside member); Rutgers University; Graduate School - New Brunswick
Date Created
Other Date2009-10 (degree)
SubjectPhilosophy, Time--Psychological aspects, Time--Philosophy
Extentviii, 228 p. : ill.
DescriptionThis dissertation offers new proposals, based on a philosophical appraisal of scientific findings, to address old philosophical problems regarding our immediate acquaintance with time. It focuses on two topics: our capacity to determine the length of intervals and our acquaintance with the present moment. A review of the relevant scientific findings concerning these topics grounds the main contributions of this dissertation. Thus, this study introduces to the philosophical literature an empirically adequate way to talk about how the mind represents time at the most fundamental level.
In order to account for our immediate acquaintance with the duration of intervals, a theoretical framework for classifying clocks is used to explain why the representational outputs of the circadian clock and the stopwatch have metric structure. A philosophical
analysis of these outputs is proposed to classify them and explain their properties. With respect to our immediate acquaintance with the present, a novel two-phase model of the present is proposed. This model shows that there are two forms of acquaintance with the present, which has consequences for contemporary debates in the philosophy of time.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references (p. 218-227)
Noteby Carlos Montemayor
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T30R9PJJ
Languageeng
CollectionGraduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024